Thursday, January 3, 2008

Thoughts on Perú

Sorry for my non-activity on the blog for such a long time. Work has been grueling.... Anyways, recently I have been talking to a friend on Facebook, who is a financial trader. He has been reading up on Kiva, and looks at it with his "financial" glasses on. Here is what he commented on regarding my earlier posts on Perú:
I perused your blog and have to say that you definitely have some good ideas from what I've read.

Regarding your thought on foreign investment or financials involved in the micro loan sector. To be honest I don't know of any in existence. But I do have to say this and it's the no brainer, investorship is drawn to growth. You look at a country like Peru and it's P/E ratio. 10.1 sounds good right? When you look at the global markets today U.S., Asia, and Uk are up there around 50 to 1. What that tells me is that there isn't too much volatility/growth capability here as compared to a country like Peru. But if you also look at the GDP of Peru, I may be mistaken it should be around 8 percent for 2007 not bad. All in all it tells me that fundamentally (briefly) that the country is not that bad price wise...actually down right cheap. The banking system is professional and inflation is down.

They currently are trying to increase free trade agreements with the U.S. as well as the UK and still is in the positive area as far as exports are concerned, but still are in rely heavily on agriculture and other natural resources. To me though I don't see any boom as far as capital-intensive manufacturing and knowledge based services yet. So until those signals are on the horizon I don't see much foreign investing happening on a wide scale, especially since it's market is still fairly small. That would also bring financials investing in the country if and when that happens.

One thing that worries me is the volatility in the government. Look what the market sentiment's reaction in the American exchanges after the Pakistan tragedy. Seriously you can't separate the two especially in "brick countries". You have to keep the scruples of a country’s economic and governmental relation in check. I know that area right now has been gray for some time now, but there has been some great changes with the new democratic president. I believe he's well suited for economic endeavors. Infrastructure wise Peru has a ways to get to the capital based and knowledge based economy that we all want.

And I think that has to start within itself for the long-term internally; thus making it more eligible for foreign investments. And that goes for financials and lending institutions domestically. Once these factors are addressed and executed upon I think we can see some foreign investing as well as loans and grants of that nature happening even from foreign product manufacturers, that tends to happen. Ultimately, I don't see an immediate change in the matters as far as companies other than the likes of Kiva expanding it's help to local Peruvian entrepreneurship; at least on the scale that we wish and through the markets. For a bit we'll have to rely on philanthropy and even loans from other governments and their private people like us. But hope is there and money is always to be made in a burgeoning economy.

Peru is still ahead of the economic curve as far as Latin categories are concerned.

My answer to him was:
thanks for your long analysis on the fundamentals of Peru. I agree with you on most points.

One thing to note is that the fundamentals may appear a bit skewed because much of the GDP growth is because of the mining industry. Especially copper and gold are quite big. This industry is mainly owned by large, foreign conglomerates like Newmont, Southern Copper, and Shougang Corp (iron ore). Much of the export money made in this industry goes towards the foreign shareholders of these companies, and has very little direct impact on the long tail of the population-- only a small portion of the population is directly involved in labor around this, and mostly in squalid / environmentally bad circumstances. See for example this Kiva loan-- and if you are further interested, Google the name of the town (Rinconada). You'll come across reports on child labor, etc. http://www.kiva.org/app.php?page=businesses&action=about&id=14886

Having said that, I have visited Peru on a regular basis over the last 10 years. The time of Fujimori's government was a transit period, from an economy that was in ruins (after Alan Garcia's first period in office) and from a period of civil upheaval (Shining Path terrorism was quite atrocious) to a more stable and peaceful time. The real proof of stability and growth came during Toledo's government, and the second term of Alan Garcia doesn't appear to be too bad from an economic growth point of view.

As you noted, the main issue appears to be the uncertainty that occurs around election season. In 2005, the #2 candidate was Ollanta Humala, a left-leaning ultra-nationalist (I didn't know you could combine these two), who on one hand was taking pages from Hugo Chavez's book, and on the other hand was fiercely anti anything non-indigenous. Very high on his list of enemies are the multitude of Chilean investors (who now own large part of the non-mining economy-- supermarket chains, fruit and wine industry, etc.), and anyone from the urban, non-indigenous population. His election would have meant an end to the relative open economy and foreign investment. Inflation and loss of values of investments (company stocks, property values, etc.) would have driven away any foreign investment and put the country back in what it was in the 1980s.

As you may have noted from my blog, I have become a believer in Hernando de Soto's call for governmental reform. Enabling the bottom class of the population (the long tail) to participate in the formal economy will unlock the potential for their growth and snowball the economic growth for the sector that has been deprived for a long time. Reform to encourage titling of property and businesses will help here. Other things that need to be done include enhanced infrastructure (roads, telecom, internet), education (especially in the rural / mountainous areas), and accessibility of health care. Other NGOs are active in those areas-- although I am concentrating my money on Kiva, they've got my moral support.
--Ramón

4 comments:

Unknown said...

Hi Ramon. I need a KIVA loan, but it doesn't say on the site how to get one. I'm a student that has just started my own business, and I need a little money to get it running and creating revenue as it should be. I have very little money, and I've thought about going to KIVA for a long time, but I don't know how to get in touch with them for a loan. I'm from a 'third-world' country, but I'm studying abroad right now, and that has taken all the money available to me. Do you have any comments on how to contact KIVA about a loan?

Ramon said...

Hi Juvoodoo,

Requests like yours are quite common, and I have received quite a few of them since I got involved with Kiva.

As you must have noticed (and may have read in some of the older entries in my blog), Kiva doesn't provide their loans directly to people in need. Also, I don't know where you are located, but Kiva doesn't work with partners in the US.

In a sense, Kiva is an intermediary between the lenders on the Internet and the local microfinance institutes that serve their customers in the developing countries. These MFIs are the ones that provide the actual loans.

Why is this important? Here are a few randomly selected reasons that come to mind:
- Kiva can't administer loans in remote parts of the world. Local microfinance institutes are a lot better equipped for that. They decently vet the borrowers and collect repayments.
- In order to continue to support local development of the poorest, it is important to have a stable and mature microfinance industry. Kiva helps small MFIs to grow and stabilize with the end-goal to make them self sufficient.
- As an intermediary which does not need to derive income from the lender-to-borrower value chain, Kiva provides the stability and trust that is needed to attract lenders in the order of the $20M that has been lent so far.

So that sounds all nice, but of doesn't quite answer your question. If you would like to receive a loan though Kiva, your best bet is to look in the Field Partners section of the Kiva website and identify if there is a MFI active in the region where you live. Then, approach this MFI. If none are listed, check your local yellowpages / business listings. Most countries have microfinancing opportunities even if not through Kiva. If you are in the US, you could also try a place like prosper.com.

Good luck in your endeavors!

Anonymous said...
This comment has been removed by a blog administrator.
Ramon said...

(previous comment was deleted because of it advertorial content)